It's high time I wrote a post about what I've been reading before I forget what these books were even about.
I love the way that
blogger mr.thomas & me rates books. This girl has great book review and reading link-ups. I've been trying to figure out a consistent way of rating books I've read.. So borrowing from Amber here is a rating star rubric:
* stay away
** ehh...don't bother
*** it's okay, I'm conflicted
**** Yes, of course
***** You need this ASAP
Love Anthony by
Lisa Genova
Earlier this year I read
Still Alice by Lisa Genova which I loved and highly recommend. I have yet to see the movie which I intend to see but obviously am avoiding because it will be heart wrenching I imagine. Love Anthony by comparison is disappointing. The character writing her debut novel from the perspective of an autistic boy that was in essence the secondary character's story just seemed contrived or a fantastical incredible coincidence of magical telepathy. Focusing on Olivia's journal and story I think, the gem in this novel, could have vaulted this novel into the same category as Still Alice.
Amazon gives this novel 4.5 stars. I give it 2 stars for my reading challenge category a
book from an author you haven't read yet. I was expecting much more!
Quiet by
Susan Cain
I purchased this non-fiction book a long time ago and it sat on my kobo reader for just as long hence falling into the category a
book at the bottom of your reading list. I thought this book would be about the value of quiet rather than an introvert vs. extrovert expose. I love quiet spaces- art galleries, museums, nature, Catholic Churches. Our world is noisy and it's not just coming from the extroverts. I go to my in laws and the tv is on non-stop. I waffle in defining whether I am an introvert or extrovert. Likely I am an introvert because I do enjoy solitude, reading, listening, but I have little problems with teamwork, open plan work spaces, brainstorming, and multitasking. Depending on the circumstances I can be gregarious and I do enjoy parties! It's funny really that in my relationship with L he is the talker and I'm the listener and yet I'd consider him more introverted in social situations than I am. For instance if we go for a drive he talks the entire way (unless he is sleeping, or studying) so that after several hours he is almost hoarse, whereas I think I really have nothing new to say. I do wish I was more articulate, had stronger socializing skills, was more comfortable in the spotlight, and had a natural ability to think and speak on my feet. Cain argues in favor of introverts in a western society where introverts get a bad wrap by focusing chapters on scientific studies. She finds introverts at the top levels of the business, legal and educational world. She argues introverts tend to think more deeply about problems and persist for longer in trying to solve them. Introverts are supposedly more likely to care about the feelings of others, to make excellent compromising leaders, and to be excellent negotiators (Cain's particular area of expertise) based on their ability to seem soft and actually be tough at the same time. She argues that the extroverts in powerful positions she has seen are more likely to take unjustified risks, to get hopped up on the thrill of the chase, to listen to the loudest person in the room, and to walk all over introverts. It was a slow, slow, slow read. I think it is meant to read like an affirmation for introverts. For me it was not the book I was expecting and I really didn't need to be affirmed as an introvert.
Amazon gives this best seller 4.5 stars. I give it a 2.
The Year of the Flood by
Margaret Atwood
This summer you could buy MA novels for less than $3 on kobo. I decided to complete the
trilogy I had started to read. My brother in Vancouver highly recommended this novel when he read it. I preferred this novel to Oryx and Crake. Perhaps it was the feminine perspective? Or less sexualized language? although there is still aspects here especially regarding sexual violence against women-- MA does enjoy writing dark dystopian novels with sexual undertones. I understood that this was a parallel perspective but it took me some time to realize that some of the characters were the same from the first novel. When I finally realized this it had a deeper intrigue. I found the Gardeners an interesting group because they anticipated the "waterless flood" or natural disaster that would obliterate life or purge mankind. The Gardeners are societal outcasts. Their oral poems/songs are weird. They are ingenious. They prepare for this flood by storing supplies and learning how to live off the land. Because of this, they are the only ones who are prepared when Crake's virus wipes out the majority of the human population. This is the story of the disaster, the events leading up to it, and the people who survived it, told from the outside.
Amazon gives it 4 stars. I give it 3 stars.
The Goldfinch by
Donna Tartt
I deliberated forever about picking a
Pullitzer Prize Winner novel. I know they are great literary reads but have you guys seen the size of these? And the price tags! So I went to the library after made a short list of possible Pullitzer Prize titles I was interested in reading and searched the library database for books on the shelf in the library. I know they can order in books from other libraries in the province but I wasn't ready for all that. All this time I've been buying books, but with moving realize I have too many heavy boxes of books. I've re-discovered the wonder of the library! I got a library card and signed out two books. I was interested in this book because of its arts connection, but 784 pages!
The novel drew me in! I didn't expect this to happen considering the far-fetching plot, cloying stock characters, overwrought message, Dickensen comparisons and gaudy cliches book reviewers warned I'd find.
The novel centers around a painting, The Goldfinch as seen through a tear in the cover image. The Goldfinch (Dutch: Het puttertje) is a 1654 animal painting by Carel Fabritius of a chained goldfinch. It is an oil painting on panel of 33.5 by 22.8 cm (13.2 by 9.0 in). The work is in the collection of the Mauritshuis in The Hague, Netherlands. In a tragic terrorist action at the Metropolitan Museum of Art 13 year old Theo Decker acquires the painting. This action will both haunt him and provide a connection to his lost mother through the course of the novel. I liked the twist when Theo finds the painting missing even if the chase to Amsterdam and the Boris connection seemed a little crazed.
The main character had such flaws and at times I really didn't like him but I was still curious to what depth he would unravel. He seemed to land on his feet unscathed despite the amount of drugs he consumed. My final criticism of the novel is the last chapter or epilogue that tried to wrap up the novel and tie off a few loose ends. If this is what the reviewers meant when they said overwrought message I agree. Without this last impression the book was a zippy, enjoyable read.
Amazon gives the novel 3.5 stars. I'd give it 4.